COLUMBIA, 5/4/11 (Beat Byte) -- In an unwitting nod to
George Orwell, Columbia police officer Chris Kelley set off a firestorm last
month when he
told the Columbia Tribune that -- per a public vote authorizing
surveillance cameras last year -- City Hall would install eight motion-activated
cameras at four locations, with a plan to "keep them unmarked, or 'plain Jane,'
so the cameras blend in with the environment."
But the ordinance demands just the opposite: any downtown
surveillance cameras must be conspicuous. No Orwellian
surveillance in our town. Former Third Ward Councilman Karl Skala (left) made that
case in an April 28 letter to the Columbia City Council.
Mr. Mayor and Council:
Please allow me to offer some historical perspective with regard to the
"Downtown Safety Camera" ballot referendum and subsequent ordinance.
In 2009, when the Council decided not to reverse its previous decision to
install "Downtown Public Street and Sidewalk Surveillance Cameras" and to defer
to a public referendum, we were told by the City Attorney that all stipulations
of the ballot language (B352-09 Ballot Language, attached) would have to be
implemented.
One of those stipulations was the "conspicuous" placement of the
surveillance cameras. Though the ballot language gave the Police
Chief some discretion, that discretion with regard to camera placement was
limited to the determination of crime "hot spots." It did not authorize
inconspicuous placement of the cameras. On the contrary, one of the
early arguments against the cameras was based on local government encroachment
on Fourth Amendment Rights with regard to "hidden" public surveillance.
Report
REP 100-10 (9/13/10) presented to the Council on 9/20/10 contained
a Columbia Police Department Report dated 9/27/10 by Renee Sinclair entitled
"Downtown Surveillance Camera Project" (REP 100-10, attached) in which the the
conspicuous placement of surveillance cameras was affirmed in the Wants, Needs
and Requirements Section on page 1, paragraph 3, "They must be overt and
conspicuous ..."
I would urge you to follow the law as it is written.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Skala
Kelley most recently said his words
were "taken out of context."
No comments:
Post a Comment