Former Central Missouri Humane Society (CMHS) director
Patty Forister (blue shirt) spoke extensively with the Columbia Heart Beat about her nearly
four years at the helm of what she calls "a wonderful organization."
With the benefit of hindsight and reflection since she
left the post in November, Forister says it took the last two years of her
tenure to crystallize the issue of city and county as "full and fair partners"
in animal care and control. That issue took flight in August 2008, shortly
after the Columbia Heart Beat first interviewed Forister for a story called
Dog Days: Humane Society Faces Closure.
Demolishing a local myth -- that CMHS receives no money
from cities and counties outside Columbia and Boone --Forister provided figures showing $2,215 from Huntsville in Randolph
County; $1,600 from Monroe City in Monroe County; $1,415 from Eldon in Miller
County; and smaller receipts from cities in Callaway, Howard, and Montgomery
counties.
But the combined amount is a pittance -- $108,915 in 2008
-- to compensate for the 5,554 animals CMHS took in under so called "animal
control contracts" with local governments, and represents the single greatest
threat to the humane society's long-term survival.
We sat down with Forister, who moved away from Columbia
last month, for a candid exchange about the humane society's past, present, and
future. Part One of our interview ran earlier this week.
Columbia Heart Beat (CHB): The first
thing people say when they hear about a high-profile departure is that there
must have been bad blood between the departing executive and the board of
directors. How do you regard the current board of directors at
CMHS?
Forister: I think the
new board has a sincere desire to move forward, especially in partnership with
the city and county. They have made steady progress toward a more fair and
equitable relationship with Columbia and Boone County, and I sincerely hope they
can do more.
CHB: Is that why former city councilman
Jim Loveless and Linda Hutton, wife of former city councilman Bob Hutton, came
on board?
Forister: That was certainly a part of
it. They are regarded as people who have strong relationships with Columbia,
which is CMHS' largest partner.
Columbia Heart Beat (CHB): Critics say
CMHS is plagued with difficulties caused by financial mismanagement. How do
you respond?
Forister: CMHS was financially stable
and making ends meet by 2008 and 2009, but unable to raise significant money for
pressing long-term needs. We had reached an income plateau where we were
getting as much as we could for shelter services, such as fees for adoptions and
low-cost spay and neuter. But we were not in any position to start a major
capital campaign and to my knowledge, still aren't.
CHB: What do you mean by "major capital
campaign?"
Forister: Where CMHS needs serious work
is on the development of major donors -- people who can write one check for
$10,000 or more. Small fees and small donations can't create a pool of capital
large enough for a major building renovation or expansion. CMHS also needs to
work with contract partners, like the city and county, to significantly raise
compensation under animal control contracts.
CHB: Whose responsibility is it to
raise money?
Forister: With private
donors, primarily the board of directors and the executive director. The board
should be well-connected and work fundraising relationships exhaustively.
The executive director supplies information about shelter needs.
I also spent a lot of time working on animal control
contracts -- to make sure we were fairly compensated. But we operated without
positions filled to conserve funds, so I was doing a million other things, too.
I designed and implemented direct mail campaigns while acting as a development
director and grant writer. Those duties fell on the director's shoulders.
CHB: Columbia City council members Jerry
Wade and Laura Nauser were critical that CMHS was not doing enough to raise
money from private donors. How do you respond?
Forister: We were absolutely working to
raise money. During this year's Feed the Animals campaign, we took in
around $30,000 from direct mail, for instance. Additional campaigns during the
year generated nearly $100,000 in income, and income has grown every year since
2005.
But individual donations from campaigns like those are
small and incremental. They mostly go toward daily operating expenses, not
long-term needs like a new shelter. As I said previously, development of large
donors is lacking at CMHS.
CHB: City council and county commission
members criticized CMHS for taking animals from surrounding cities/counties
without compensation, saying that Columbia and Boone County shouldn't be
subsidizing stray animals from Fulton or Moberly. How do you
respond?
Forister: The numbers simply don't bear
this out. At the Columbia City Council's request, we did a study and found that
only a fraction of animals come in from surrounding cities or counties, and CMHS
does receive money from many of them under animal control
contracts.
By far, the vast majority of our strays came from Columbia
and Boone County. For instance, from the Fulton/Callaway county area last
year, CMHS took in 126 strays versus 1,405 from Columbia.
CHB: But still, shouldn't you be asking
for compensation from everyone all the time?
Forister: You need a functional model on
which to base a compensation agreement or contract, especially when you have to
sell it to a board of directors, a government agency, or a group of lawmakers.
If CMHS goes to Fulton, for instance, it needs to present
their city council with a well-oiled contract that evidence shows will work.
But CMHS has a dysfunctional contract with the City of Columbia and Boone
County. Why try to sell a dysfunctional model to another city or county?
NEXT TIME: Forister's surprising
insights on ZooToo founder Richard Thompson
No comments:
Post a Comment